Bedford Park vs Eden Hills, SA Suburb Comparison

Bedford Park for retirees; Eden Hills for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bedford ParkEden Hills

Overall score

Bedford Park

40.8/100

Eden Hills

48.9/100

Crime rate

Bedford Park

90.2 / 1k

Eden Hills

17.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bedford Park

228

Eden Hills

77

Population

Bedford Park

1,882

Eden Hills

3,020

Metric leadBedford Park 5Eden Hills 61 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBedford ParkEden Hills
Overall score40.8/10048.9/100
Housing (desirability)9.5/10064.1/100
Crime rate90.2 / 1k17.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops3220
Walkability57.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities22877
Planning activity1950
Green cover24.3%1.5%
Population1,8823,020
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/109/10

Comparison summary

Bedford Park is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Eden Hills is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Eden Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Bedford Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Bedford Park pulls ahead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Eden Hills is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options. On housing, Bedford Park sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Eden Hills.

Households prioritising schools may find Bedford Park the better fit, while retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Eden Hills.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons