Bedford Park vs Pasadena, SA Suburb Comparison

Bedford Park for retirees and schools; Pasadena for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bedford ParkPasadena

Overall score

Bedford Park

40.8/100

Pasadena

50.3/100

Crime rate

Bedford Park

90.2 / 1k

Pasadena

57.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bedford Park

228

Pasadena

175

Population

Bedford Park

1,882

Pasadena

3,073

Metric leadBedford Park 4Pasadena 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBedford ParkPasadena
Overall score40.8/10050.3/100
Housing (desirability)9.5/10063.0/100
Crime rate90.2 / 1k57.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops3216
Walkability57.0/10068.0/100
Nearby amenities228175
Planning activity1933
Green cover24.3%7.0%
Population1,8823,073
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/108/10

Comparison summary

Bedford Park reads as a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by; Pasadena is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Bedford Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Pasadena is closer to the city centre.

Bedford Park tends to lead on public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space, while Pasadena stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability. On housing, Bedford Park sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Pasadena.

Choose Bedford Park if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Pasadena for retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons