Bedford Park vs Pasadena, SA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Bedford Park | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.5/100 | 52.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 23.2/100 | 28.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 94.0 / 1k | 59.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 32 | 16 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 68.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 225 | 174 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 17 |
| Population | 1,882 | 3,073 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesPasadena
- Best for familiesBedford Park
- Best for investmentPasadena
- Best for best valuePasadena
- Best for best schoolsBedford Park
Comparison summary
Bedford Park reads as a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by; Pasadena is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Bedford Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Pasadena is closer to the city centre.
Bedford Park tends to lead on public transport access and nearby cafés and amenities, while Pasadena stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Bedford Park sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Pasadena.
Choose Bedford Park if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Pasadena for retirees and investors.