Bedford Park vs Pasadena, SA suburb comparison

Bedford Park for families and schools; Pasadena for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bedford ParkPasadena

Overall score

Bedford Park

49.7/100

Pasadena

53.0/100

Crime rate

Bedford Park

79.8 / 1k

Pasadena

55.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bedford Park

225

Pasadena

174

Population

Bedford Park

1,882

Pasadena

3,073

Metric leadBedford Park 3Pasadena 61 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBedford ParkPasadena
Overall score49.7/10053.0/100
Housing (desirability)23.2/10028.1/100
Crime rate79.8 / 1k55.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Public transport stops3216
Walkability57.0/10068.0/100
Nearby amenities225174
Planning activity1526
Population1,8823,073
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/108/10

Comparison summary

Bedford Park reads as a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by; Pasadena is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Bedford Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Pasadena is closer to the city centre.

Bedford Park tends to lead on public transport access and nearby cafés and amenities, while Pasadena stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Bedford Park sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Pasadena.

Choose Bedford Park if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Pasadena for retirees and investors.

Related comparisons