Overall score
Bedford Park
49.7/100
Pasadena
53.0/100
Bedford Park for families and schools; Pasadena for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bedford Park
49.7/100
Pasadena
53.0/100
Crime rate
Bedford Park
79.8 / 1k
Pasadena
55.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bedford Park
225
Pasadena
174
Population
Bedford Park
1,882
Pasadena
3,073
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bedford Park | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.7/100 | 53.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 23.2/100 | 28.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 79.8 / 1k | 55.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 32 | 16 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 68.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 225 | 174 |
| Planning activity | 15 | 26 |
| Population | 1,882 | 3,073 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Bedford Park reads as a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by; Pasadena is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Bedford Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Pasadena is closer to the city centre.
Bedford Park tends to lead on public transport access and nearby cafés and amenities, while Pasadena stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Bedford Park sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Pasadena.
Choose Bedford Park if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Pasadena for retirees and investors.