Bedford Park vs Panorama, SA Suburb Comparison

Bedford Park for retirees and families; Panorama for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bedford ParkPanorama

Overall score

Bedford Park

40.8/100

Panorama

47.6/100

Crime rate

Bedford Park

90.2 / 1k

Panorama

28.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bedford Park

228

Panorama

45

Population

Bedford Park

1,882

Panorama

2,388

Metric leadBedford Park 6Panorama 51 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBedford ParkPanorama
Overall score40.8/10047.6/100
Housing (desirability)9.5/10067.3/100
Crime rate90.2 / 1k28.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools21
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops3219
Walkability57.0/10028.5/100
Nearby amenities22845
Planning activity1936
Green cover24.3%8.5%
Population1,8822,388
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bedford Park is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Panorama is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap. Bedford Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Panorama is closer to the city centre.

Bedford Park tends to lead on schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability, while Panorama stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability. On housing, Bedford Park sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Panorama.

Choose Bedford Park if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Panorama for retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons