Overall score
Melrose Park
46.8/100
Pasadena
54.8/100
Melrose Park vs Pasadena, SA suburb comparison
Pasadena for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Melrose ParkPasadena
Crime rate
Melrose Park
78.3 / 1k
Pasadena
57.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Melrose Park
148
Pasadena
174
Population
Melrose Park
2,319
Pasadena
3,073
Metric leadMelrose Park 1Pasadena 9across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Melrose Park | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.8/100 | 54.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 34.0/100 | 28.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 78.3 / 1k | 57.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 15 | 16 |
| Walkability | 53.5/100 | 68.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 148 | 174 |
| Planning activity | 43 | 26 |
| Population | 2,319 | 3,073 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Melrose Park is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while Pasadena is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Melrose Park is stronger for housing affordability; Pasadena answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.
Choose Melrose Park if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Pasadena for investors.