Belmont North vs Belmont South, NSW Suburb Comparison

Belmont North for retirees and families; Belmont South for beach lifestyle and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Belmont NorthBelmont South

Overall score

Belmont North

47.0/100

Belmont South

35.2/100

Crime rate

Belmont North

88.0 / 1k

Belmont South

87.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belmont North

105

Belmont South

44

Population

Belmont North

6,291

Belmont South

1,053

Metric leadBelmont North 8Belmont South 31 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelmont NorthBelmont South
Overall score47.0/10035.2/100
Housing (desirability)62.8/10064.3/100
Crime rate88.0 / 1k87.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools62
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves1—
Public transport stops11525
Walkability51.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities10544
Planning activity325
Green cover4.7%1.8%
Population6,2911,053
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Belmont North reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Belmont South is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where Belmont South is shaped by the coast, Belmont North offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Belmont North is stronger for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability; Belmont South answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

Choose Belmont North if you are weighing retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Belmont South for people chasing a beach lifestyle.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons