Overall score
Belmont North
52.7/100
Croudace Bay
32.4/100
Belmont North for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Belmont North
52.7/100
Croudace Bay
32.4/100
Crime rate
Belmont North
88.0 / 1k
Croudace Bay
88.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belmont North
101
Croudace Bay
22
Population
Belmont North
6,291
Croudace Bay
641
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belmont North | Croudace Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.7/100 | 32.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.7/100 | 57.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 88.0 / 1k | 88.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 115 | 21 |
| Walkability | 51.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 101 | 22 |
| Planning activity | 27 | 3 |
| Population | 6,291 | 641 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 8/10 |
Belmont North is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Croudace Bay is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm. Belmont North sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Croudace Bay is further out with more breathing room.
Belmont North tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Croudace Bay stands out for a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Belmont North, while Croudace Bay remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.