Belmont vs Chandler, QLD Suburb Comparison

Belmont for families and investment; Chandler for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BelmontChandler

Overall score

Belmont

54.1/100

Chandler

58.1/100

Crime rate

Belmont

59.8 / 1k

Chandler

99.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belmont

37

Chandler

37

Population

Belmont

4,498

Chandler

1,475

Metric leadBelmont 5Chandler 33 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelmontChandler
Overall score54.1/10058.1/100
Housing (desirability)50.0/10043.5/100
Crime rate59.8 / 1k99.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops1713
Walkability25.5/10019.5/100
Nearby amenities3737
Green cover2.4%8.4%
Population4,4981,475
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Belmont is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Chandler is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand.

Belmont tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, while Chandler stands out for parks and reserves.

On balance, households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Belmont, while Chandler remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons