Belmont vs Mackenzie, QLD Suburb Comparison

Belmont for investment and schools; Mackenzie for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BelmontMackenzie

Overall score

Belmont

54.1/100

Mackenzie

53.8/100

Crime rate

Belmont

59.8 / 1k

Mackenzie

54.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belmont

37

Mackenzie

41

Population

Belmont

4,498

Mackenzie

2,336

Metric leadBelmont 5Mackenzie 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelmontMackenzie
Overall score54.1/10053.8/100
Housing (desirability)50.0/10041.6/100
Crime rate59.8 / 1k54.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops177
Walkability25.5/10010.5/100
Nearby amenities3741
Green cover2.4%20.6%
Population4,4982,336
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Belmont is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Mackenzie is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand.

Belmont pulls ahead on public transport access, walkability, and a larger local community, whereas Mackenzie is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mackenzie, while Belmont remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons