Overall score
Belmont
54.1/100
Mackenzie
53.8/100
Belmont for investment and schools; Mackenzie for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Belmont
54.1/100
Mackenzie
53.8/100
Crime rate
Belmont
59.8 / 1k
Mackenzie
54.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belmont
37
Mackenzie
41
Population
Belmont
4,498
Mackenzie
2,336
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belmont | Mackenzie |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.1/100 | 53.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.0/100 | 41.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 59.8 / 1k | 54.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | — |
| Public transport stops | 17 | 7 |
| Walkability | 25.5/100 | 10.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 37 | 41 |
| Green cover | 2.4% | 20.6% |
| Population | 4,498 | 2,336 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Belmont is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Mackenzie is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand.
Belmont pulls ahead on public transport access, walkability, and a larger local community, whereas Mackenzie is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mackenzie, while Belmont remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.