Overall score
Bentley
47.8/100
Shelley
45.2/100
Bentley vs Shelley, WA Suburb Comparison
Bentley for retirees; Shelley for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BentleyShelley
Crime rate
Bentley
77.5 / 1k
Shelley
77.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bentley
679
Shelley
126
Population
Bentley
9,051
Shelley
4,795
Metric leadBentley 7Shelley 23 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bentley | Shelley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.8/100 | 45.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.5/100 | 46.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 77.5 / 1k | 77.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 27 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 91 | 22 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 47.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 679 | 126 |
| Green cover | 7.1% | 7.1% |
| Population | 9,051 | 4,795 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Bentley reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Shelley is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Bentley tends to lead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Shelley stands out for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Bentley generally means more approachable housing costs, while Shelley leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Shelley, while Bentley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.