Bentley vs Riverton, WA Suburb Comparison

Bentley for retirees; Riverton for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BentleyRiverton

Overall score

Bentley

47.8/100

Riverton

44.9/100

Crime rate

Bentley

77.5 / 1k

Riverton

77.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bentley

679

Riverton

100

Population

Bentley

9,051

Riverton

6,078

Metric leadBentley 7Riverton 23 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBentleyRiverton
Overall score47.8/10044.9/100
Housing (desirability)38.5/10057.2/100
Crime rate77.5 / 1k77.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools88
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves279
Public transport stops9124
Walkability100.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities679100
Green cover7.1%5.5%
Population9,0516,078
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/109/10

Comparison summary

Bentley is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Riverton is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Bentley sits closer to the city centre, whereas Riverton is in a middle-ring position.

Bentley tends to lead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability, while Riverton stands out for housing affordability, overall desirability, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Bentley generally means more approachable housing costs, while Riverton leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Riverton, while Bentley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons