Ferndale vs Riverton, WA Suburb Comparison

Ferndale for retirees and investment; Riverton for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FerndaleRiverton

Overall score

Ferndale

46.4/100

Riverton

44.9/100

Crime rate

Ferndale

77.5 / 1k

Riverton

77.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ferndale

163

Riverton

100

Population

Ferndale

4,457

Riverton

6,078

Metric leadFerndale 5Riverton 34 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFerndaleRiverton
Overall score46.4/10044.9/100
Housing (desirability)51.9/10057.2/100
Crime rate77.5 / 1k77.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools88
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves99
Public transport stops3424
Walkability47.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities163100
Green cover10.8%5.5%
Population4,4576,078
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/109/10

Comparison summary

Ferndale reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Riverton is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Ferndale is stronger for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Riverton answers with housing affordability, overall desirability, and a larger local community.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Riverton, while Ferndale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons