Overall score
Beresford
37.8/100
Bluff Point
48.2/100
Beresford vs Bluff Point, WA Suburb Comparison
Bluff Point for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BeresfordBluff Point
Crime rate
Beresford
132.8 / 1k
Bluff Point
132.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beresford
22
Bluff Point
47
Population
Beresford
1,463
Bluff Point
1,381
Metric leadBeresford 2Bluff Point 55 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesBluff Point
- Best for familiesBluff Point
- Best for investmentBluff Point
- Best for best valueBluff Point
- Best for best schoolsBluff Point
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beresford | Bluff Point |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.8/100 | 48.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.6/100 | 61.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 132.8 / 1k | 132.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 2.8/100 | 2.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 18 | 20 |
| Walkability | 27.0/100 | 80.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 22 | 47 |
| Green cover | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Population | 1,463 | 1,381 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Beresford is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Bluff Point is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Beresford pulls ahead on schools and education options, plus a larger local community, whereas Bluff Point is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.
Households prioritising schools may find Beresford the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Bluff Point.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.