Beresford vs Geraldton, WA suburb comparison

Beresford for retirees and families; Geraldton for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeresfordGeraldton

Overall score

Beresford

34.6/100

Geraldton

57.0/100

Crime rate

Beresford

4951.8 / 1k

Geraldton

2206.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beresford

3

Geraldton

112

Population

Beresford

1,463

Geraldton

3,246

Metric leadBeresford 1Geraldton 9across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeresfordGeraldton
Overall score34.6/10057.0/100
Housing (desirability)19.2/10028.2/100
Crime rate4951.8 / 1k2206.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools611
Parks & reserves37
Public transport stops1837
Walkability27.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities3112
Population1,4633,246
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Beresford is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Geraldton is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

On the data, Beresford is stronger for stronger socioeconomic advantage; Geraldton answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Beresford generally means more mid-market housing value, while Geraldton leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees and families may find Beresford the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Geraldton.

Related comparisons