Beresford vs Strathalbyn, WA suburb comparison

Beresford for families and schools; Strathalbyn for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeresfordStrathalbyn

Overall score

Beresford

34.6/100

Strathalbyn

44.6/100

Crime rate

Beresford

4951.8 / 1k

Strathalbyn

5884.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beresford

3

Strathalbyn

2

Population

Beresford

1,463

Strathalbyn

1,165

Metric leadBeresford 5Strathalbyn 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeresfordStrathalbyn
Overall score34.6/10044.6/100
Housing (desirability)19.2/10091.7/100
Crime rate4951.8 / 1k5884.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools61
Parks & reserves33
Public transport stops18
Walkability27.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities32
Population1,4631,165
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Beresford is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Strathalbyn is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

Beresford tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, while Strathalbyn stands out for housing affordability and overall desirability.

Choose Beresford if you are weighing families; lean toward Strathalbyn for retirees and investors.

Related comparisons