Berrimah vs Karama, NT Suburb Comparison

Berrimah for retirees and families; Karama for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BerrimahKarama

Overall score

Berrimah

48.1/100

Karama

47.0/100

Nearby amenities

Berrimah

139

Karama

411

Population

Berrimah

1,199

Karama

4,803

Metric leadBerrimah 4Karama 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBerrimahKarama
Overall score48.1/10047.0/100
Housing (desirability)6.0/10049.9/100
Schools & preschools29
Weather (desirability)9.6/1009.6/100
Parks & reserves42
Public transport stops1929
Walkability51.5/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities139411
Green cover8.7%2.8%
Population1,1994,803
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/103/10

Comparison summary

Berrimah is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Karama is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Berrimah tends to lead on parks and reserves, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Karama stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access. Berrimah generally means more mid-market housing value, while Karama leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Berrimah suits retirees and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Karama is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons