Overall score
Karama
47.0/100
Wulagi
43.2/100
Karama vs Wulagi, NT Suburb Comparison
Karama for retirees; Wulagi for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
KaramaWulagi
Nearby amenities
Karama
411
Wulagi
306
Population
Karama
4,803
Wulagi
2,510
Metric leadKarama 6Wulagi 41 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Karama | Wulagi |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.0/100 | 43.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.9/100 | 44.0/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 13 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 29 | 15 |
| Walkability | 80.0/100 | 22.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 411 | 306 |
| Green cover | 2.8% | 3.2% |
| Population | 4,803 | 2,510 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Karama is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Wulagi is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Karama pulls ahead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Wulagi is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Karama generally means more approachable housing costs, while Wulagi leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
Choose Karama if you are weighing value-focused buyers; lean toward Wulagi for retirees.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.