Overall score
Beulah Park
52.1/100
Dulwich
65.6/100
Beulah Park vs Dulwich, SA Suburb Comparison
Beulah Park for value; Dulwich for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Beulah ParkDulwich
Crime rate
Beulah Park
30.7 / 1k
Dulwich
24.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beulah Park
77
Dulwich
129
Population
Beulah Park
1,601
Dulwich
1,659
Metric leadBeulah Park 2Dulwich 72 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesDulwich
- Best for investmentDulwich
- Best for best valueBeulah Park
- Best for best schoolsDulwich
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beulah Park | Dulwich |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.1/100 | 65.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.1/100 | 53.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 30.7 / 1k | 24.3 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 12 |
| Walkability | 19.0/100 | 74.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 77 | 129 |
| Planning activity | 19 | 15 |
| Green cover | 1.8% | 0.1% |
| Population | 1,601 | 1,659 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Beulah Park reads as a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by; Dulwich is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Beulah Park tends to lead on housing affordability, plus tree cover and green space, while Dulwich stands out for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Dulwich, while Beulah Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.