Overall score
Beulah Park
52.1/100
Rose Park
54.0/100
Beulah Park for retirees and investment; Rose Park for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beulah Park
52.1/100
Rose Park
54.0/100
Crime rate
Beulah Park
30.7 / 1k
Rose Park
16.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beulah Park
77
Rose Park
99
Population
Beulah Park
1,601
Rose Park
1,375
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beulah Park | Rose Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.1/100 | 54.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.1/100 | 45.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 30.7 / 1k | 16.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 12 |
| Walkability | 19.0/100 | 20.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 77 | 99 |
| Planning activity | 19 | 24 |
| Green cover | 1.8% | 0.5% |
| Population | 1,601 | 1,375 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Beulah Park is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Rose Park is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Beulah Park is stronger for housing affordability, tree cover and green space, and a calmer planning outlook; Rose Park answers with a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability.
Value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools may find Beulah Park the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Rose Park.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.