Glenunga vs Rose Park, SA Suburb Comparison

Glenunga for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GlenungaRose Park

Overall score

Glenunga

57.9/100

Rose Park

54.0/100

Crime rate

Glenunga

60.4 / 1k

Rose Park

16.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Glenunga

143

Rose Park

99

Population

Glenunga

2,184

Rose Park

1,375

Metric leadGlenunga 6Rose Park 42 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGlenungaRose Park
Overall score57.9/10054.0/100
Housing (desirability)68.0/10045.0/100
Crime rate60.4 / 1k16.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops812
Walkability68.0/10020.0/100
Nearby amenities14399
Planning activity3324
Green cover5.1%0.5%
Population2,1841,375
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Glenunga is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Rose Park is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Glenunga pulls ahead on housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Rose Park is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access.

Glenunga suits investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Rose Park is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons