Overall score
Linden Park
52.4/100
Rose Park
54.0/100
Linden Park vs Rose Park, SA Suburb Comparison
Linden Park for retirees and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Linden ParkRose Park
Crime rate
Linden Park
31.2 / 1k
Rose Park
16.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Linden Park
129
Rose Park
99
Population
Linden Park
2,367
Rose Park
1,375
Metric leadLinden Park 4Rose Park 62 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesLinden Park
- Best for best valueLinden Park
- Best for best schoolsLinden Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Linden Park | Rose Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.4/100 | 54.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.9/100 | 45.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 31.2 / 1k | 16.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 10 | 12 |
| Walkability | 40.0/100 | 20.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 129 | 99 |
| Planning activity | 29 | 24 |
| Green cover | 3.0% | 0.5% |
| Population | 2,367 | 1,375 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Linden Park is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Rose Park is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Linden Park is stronger for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Rose Park answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access.
Linden Park suits investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Rose Park is the stronger match for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.