Blackmans Bay vs Gosnells Suburb Comparison (TAS vs WA)

Blackmans Bay for families and investment; Gosnells for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Blackmans BayGosnells

Overall score

Blackmans Bay

60.4/100

Gosnells

43.9/100

Crime rate

Blackmans Bay

22.8 / 1k

Gosnells

60.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Blackmans Bay

157

Gosnells

791

Population

Blackmans Bay

7,688

Gosnells

21,149

Metric leadBlackmans Bay 6Gosnells 6across 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBlackmans BayGosnells
Overall score60.4/10043.9/100
Housing (desirability)68.2/10050.0/100
Crime rate22.8 / 1k60.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools27
Weather (desirability)82.3/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves540
Public transport stops48143
Walkability80.0/10070.0/100
Nearby amenities157791
Green cover3.8%10.3%
Population7,68821,149
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/101/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Blackmans Bay is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, whereas Gosnells is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Blackmans Bay sits among greener hillside streets, while Gosnells keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Blackmans Bay tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability, while Gosnells stands out for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access. Blackmans Bay generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Gosnells leans toward more sought-after housing.

Blackmans Bay suits retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Gosnells is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons