Blewitt Springs vs Hackham, SA Suburb Comparison

Blewitt Springs for retirees; Hackham for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Blewitt SpringsHackham

Overall score

Blewitt Springs

35.9/100

Hackham

38.3/100

Crime rate

Blewitt Springs

18.9 / 1k

Hackham

38.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Blewitt Springs

8

Hackham

96

Population

Blewitt Springs

346

Hackham

4,491

Metric leadBlewitt Springs 4Hackham 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBlewitt SpringsHackham
Overall score35.9/10038.3/100
Housing (desirability)41.6/10075.0/100
Crime rate18.9 / 1k38.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops—21
Walkability0.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities896
Planning activity737
Green cover13.5%3.2%
Population3464,491
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/101/10

Comparison summary

Blewitt Springs reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Hackham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Blewitt Springs sits among greener hillside streets, while Hackham keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Blewitt Springs pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, tree cover and green space, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Hackham is the better pick for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. Blewitt Springs generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Hackham leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Blewitt Springs if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Hackham for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons