Overall score
Blewitt Springs
41.8/100
Hackham
52.8/100
Blewitt Springs for retirees; Hackham for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Blewitt Springs
41.8/100
Hackham
52.8/100
Crime rate
Blewitt Springs
18.9 / 1k
Hackham
42.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Blewitt Springs
1
Hackham
93
Population
Blewitt Springs
346
Hackham
4,491
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Blewitt Springs | Hackham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.8/100 | 52.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.7/100 | 77.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 18.9 / 1k | 42.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | — | 21 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 93 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 32 |
| Population | 346 | 4,491 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 1/10 |
Blewitt Springs reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Hackham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Blewitt Springs sits among greener hillside streets, while Hackham keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Blewitt Springs pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Hackham is the better pick for housing affordability and walkability. Blewitt Springs generally means more mid-market housing value, while Hackham leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Blewitt Springs if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Hackham for investors and value-focused buyers.