Christie Downs vs Hackham, SA Suburb Comparison

Christie Downs for retirees and families; Hackham for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Christie DownsHackham

Overall score

Christie Downs

37.6/100

Hackham

38.3/100

Crime rate

Christie Downs

129.9 / 1k

Hackham

38.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Christie Downs

179

Hackham

96

Population

Christie Downs

5,239

Hackham

4,491

Metric leadChristie Downs 5Hackham 52 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChristie DownsHackham
Overall score37.6/10038.3/100
Housing (desirability)54.7/10075.0/100
Crime rate129.9 / 1k38.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools92
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops3621
Walkability74.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities17996
Planning activity11737
Green cover11.1%3.2%
Population5,2394,491
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Christie Downs is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Hackham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Christie Downs is stronger for schools and education options, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities; Hackham answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability. On housing, Christie Downs sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Hackham.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Christie Downs the better fit, while retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Hackham.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons