Christie Downs vs Hackham, SA suburb comparison

Christie Downs for families and schools; Hackham for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Christie DownsHackham

Overall score

Christie Downs

56.3/100

Hackham

52.8/100

Crime rate

Christie Downs

131.8 / 1k

Hackham

42.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Christie Downs

175

Hackham

93

Population

Christie Downs

5,239

Hackham

4,491

Metric leadChristie Downs 5Hackham 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChristie DownsHackham
Overall score56.3/10052.8/100
Housing (desirability)55.4/10077.4/100
Crime rate131.8 / 1k42.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools92
Public transport stops3621
Walkability74.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities17593
Planning activity9232
Population5,2394,491
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Christie Downs is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Hackham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Christie Downs is stronger for schools and education options and public transport access; Hackham answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Christie Downs the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Hackham.

Related comparisons