Overall score
Christie Downs
37.6/100
Hackham
38.3/100
Christie Downs for retirees and families; Hackham for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Christie Downs
37.6/100
Hackham
38.3/100
Crime rate
Christie Downs
129.9 / 1k
Hackham
38.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Christie Downs
179
Hackham
96
Population
Christie Downs
5,239
Hackham
4,491
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Christie Downs | Hackham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.6/100 | 38.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.7/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 129.9 / 1k | 38.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Public transport stops | 36 | 21 |
| Walkability | 74.0/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 179 | 96 |
| Planning activity | 117 | 37 |
| Green cover | 11.1% | 3.2% |
| Population | 5,239 | 4,491 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Christie Downs is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Hackham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Christie Downs is stronger for schools and education options, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities; Hackham answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability. On housing, Christie Downs sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Hackham.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Christie Downs the better fit, while retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Hackham.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.