Overall score
Christie Downs
56.3/100
Hackham
52.8/100
Christie Downs for families and schools; Hackham for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Christie Downs
56.3/100
Hackham
52.8/100
Crime rate
Christie Downs
131.8 / 1k
Hackham
42.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Christie Downs
175
Hackham
93
Population
Christie Downs
5,239
Hackham
4,491
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Christie Downs | Hackham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.3/100 | 52.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.4/100 | 77.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 131.8 / 1k | 42.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 36 | 21 |
| Walkability | 74.0/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 175 | 93 |
| Planning activity | 92 | 32 |
| Population | 5,239 | 4,491 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Christie Downs is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Hackham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Christie Downs is stronger for schools and education options and public transport access; Hackham answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Christie Downs the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Hackham.