Overall score
Bonegilla
52.2/100
Wodonga
51.0/100
Bonegilla vs Wodonga, VIC Suburb Comparison
Bonegilla for schools; Wodonga for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BonegillaWodonga
Crime rate
Bonegilla
22.8 / 1k
Wodonga
131.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bonegilla
29
Wodonga
696
Population
Bonegilla
610
Wodonga
20,259
Metric leadBonegilla 4Wodonga 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bonegilla | Wodonga |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.2/100 | 51.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.7/100 | 68.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.8 / 1k | 131.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 58 |
| Public transport stops | — | 76 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 29 | 696 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 95 |
| Green cover | 2.9% | 11.1% |
| Population | 610 | 20,259 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Bonegilla is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Wodonga is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
Bonegilla pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Wodonga is the better pick for parks and reserves, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. Bonegilla generally means more sought-after housing, while Wodonga leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Bonegilla suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Wodonga is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.