Bonnet Hill vs Huntingfield, TAS Suburb Comparison

Bonnet Hill for retirees and families; Huntingfield for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bonnet HillHuntingfield

Overall score

Bonnet Hill

47.6/100

Huntingfield

46.0/100

Crime rate

Bonnet Hill

22.8 / 1k

Huntingfield

22.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bonnet Hill

28

Huntingfield

32

Population

Bonnet Hill

515

Huntingfield

540

Metric leadBonnet Hill 5Huntingfield 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBonnet HillHuntingfield
Overall score47.6/10046.0/100
Housing (desirability)54.0/10061.4/100
Crime rate22.8 / 1k22.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools—3
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops83
Walkability12.0/1006.5/100
Nearby amenities2832
Green cover0.9%0.4%
Population515540
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/105/10

Comparison summary

Bonnet Hill is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, while Huntingfield is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Bonnet Hill sits closer to the city centre, whereas Huntingfield is in a middle-ring position.

Bonnet Hill tends to lead on public transport access, walkability, and overall desirability, while Huntingfield stands out for parks and reserves, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community. Bonnet Hill generally means more sought-after housing, while Huntingfield leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Retirees may find Bonnet Hill the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Huntingfield.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons