Overall score
Huntingfield
45.1/100
Margate
52.7/100
Huntingfield for families and schools; Margate for retirees and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Huntingfield
45.1/100
Margate
52.7/100
Crime rate
Huntingfield
2435.0 / 1k
Margate
324.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Huntingfield
26
Margate
10
Population
Huntingfield
540
Margate
4,239
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Huntingfield | Margate |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.1/100 | 52.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 2435.0 / 1k | 324.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 14 |
| Walkability | 6.5/100 | 21.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 26 | 10 |
| Population | 540 | 4,239 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Huntingfield is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, and Margate is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Margate sits among greener hillside streets, while Huntingfield keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Huntingfield tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities, while Margate stands out for a quieter safety profile and public transport access. Huntingfield generally means more mid-market housing value, while Margate leans toward more sought-after housing.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Huntingfield the better fit, while retirees and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Margate.