Boorooma vs North Wagga Wagga, NSW Suburb Comparison

Boorooma for value and schools; North Wagga Wagga for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BooroomaNorth Wagga Wagga

Overall score

Boorooma

46.6/100

North Wagga Wagga

44.6/100

Crime rate

Boorooma

119.6 / 1k

North Wagga Wagga

118.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Boorooma

30

North Wagga Wagga

53

Population

Boorooma

1,741

North Wagga Wagga

679

Metric leadBoorooma 7North Wagga Wagga 42 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBooroomaNorth Wagga Wagga
Overall score46.6/10044.6/100
Housing (desirability)51.9/10049.3/100
Crime rate119.6 / 1k118.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Weather (desirability)11.8/10011.8/100
Parks & reserves32
Public transport stops2422
Walkability76.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities3053
Planning activity106
Green cover3.0%4.8%
Population1,741679
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Boorooma is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and North Wagga Wagga is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Boorooma tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while North Wagga Wagga stands out for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Boorooma sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in North Wagga Wagga.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Boorooma, while North Wagga Wagga remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons