Overall score
Charles Sturt University
46.7/100
North Wagga Wagga
44.6/100
Charles Sturt University for retirees and schools; North Wagga Wagga for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Charles Sturt University
46.7/100
North Wagga Wagga
44.6/100
Crime rate
Charles Sturt University
49.5 / 1k
North Wagga Wagga
118.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Charles Sturt University
88
North Wagga Wagga
53
Population
Charles Sturt University
433
North Wagga Wagga
679
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Charles Sturt University | North Wagga Wagga |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.7/100 | 44.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | — | 49.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 49.5 / 1k | 118.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 11.8/100 | 11.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 21 | 22 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 36.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 88 | 53 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 6 |
| Green cover | 8.5% | 4.8% |
| Population | 433 | 679 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | — | 3/10 |
Charles Sturt University reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; North Wagga Wagga is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.
On the data, Charles Sturt University is stronger for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook; North Wagga Wagga answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability. Charles Sturt University generally means more mid-market housing value, while North Wagga Wagga leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Charles Sturt University if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward North Wagga Wagga for investors and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.