suburb.guide

Charles Sturt University vs Turvey Park, NSW suburb comparison

Turvey Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Charles Sturt UniversityTurvey Park

Overall score

Charles Sturt University

25.4/100

Turvey Park

49.3/100

Crime rate

Charles Sturt University

49.5 / 1k

Turvey Park

119.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Charles Sturt University

87

Turvey Park

128

Population

Charles Sturt University

433

Turvey Park

3,572

Metric leadCharles Sturt University 2Turvey Park 61 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCharles Sturt UniversityTurvey Park
Overall score25.4/10049.3/100
Housing (desirability)—78.4/100
Crime rate49.5 / 1k119.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools213
Parks & reserves12
Public transport stops2159
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities87128
Planning activity228
Population4333,572
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)—7/10

Comparison summary

Charles Sturt University reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; Turvey Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

On the data, Charles Sturt University is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Turvey Park answers with parks and reserves and public transport access.

Choose Charles Sturt University if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Turvey Park for retirees and investors.

Related comparisons