Overall score
Charles Sturt University
46.7/100
Turvey Park
45.7/100
Charles Sturt University for retirees and families; Turvey Park for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Charles Sturt University
46.7/100
Turvey Park
45.7/100
Crime rate
Charles Sturt University
49.5 / 1k
Turvey Park
119.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Charles Sturt University
88
Turvey Park
133
Population
Charles Sturt University
433
Turvey Park
3,572
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Charles Sturt University | Turvey Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.7/100 | 45.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | — | 61.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 49.5 / 1k | 119.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 13 |
| Weather (desirability) | 11.8/100 | 11.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 21 | 59 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 88 | 133 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 30 |
| Green cover | 8.5% | 19.8% |
| Population | 433 | 3,572 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | — | 7/10 |
Charles Sturt University reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; Turvey Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
On the data, Charles Sturt University is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Turvey Park answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access. On housing, Charles Sturt University sits in a well priced band, compared with a gently premium feel in Turvey Park.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Turvey Park, while Charles Sturt University remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.