Charles Sturt University vs Turvey Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Charles Sturt University for retirees and families; Turvey Park for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Charles Sturt UniversityTurvey Park

Overall score

Charles Sturt University

46.7/100

Turvey Park

45.7/100

Crime rate

Charles Sturt University

49.5 / 1k

Turvey Park

119.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Charles Sturt University

88

Turvey Park

133

Population

Charles Sturt University

433

Turvey Park

3,572

Metric leadCharles Sturt University 3Turvey Park 62 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCharles Sturt UniversityTurvey Park
Overall score46.7/10045.7/100
Housing (desirability)—61.9/100
Crime rate49.5 / 1k119.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools213
Weather (desirability)11.8/10011.8/100
Parks & reserves12
Public transport stops2159
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities88133
Planning activity230
Green cover8.5%19.8%
Population4333,572
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)—7/10

Comparison summary

Charles Sturt University reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; Turvey Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

On the data, Charles Sturt University is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Turvey Park answers with schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access. On housing, Charles Sturt University sits in a well priced band, compared with a gently premium feel in Turvey Park.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Turvey Park, while Charles Sturt University remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons