Ashmont vs Turvey Park, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Ashmont | Turvey Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.5/100 | 47.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 81.2/100 | 78.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 122.2 / 1k | 122.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 45 | 59 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 68 | 128 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 17 |
| Population | 3,747 | 3,572 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesTurvey Park
- Best for best schoolsAshmont
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Ashmont is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Turvey Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Ashmont pulls ahead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, whereas Turvey Park is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access. On housing, Ashmont sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Turvey Park.
Households prioritising schools may find Ashmont the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Turvey Park.