Ashmont vs Tolland, NSW Suburb Comparison

Ashmont for retirees and families; Tolland for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AshmontTolland

Overall score

Ashmont

36.4/100

Tolland

37.1/100

Crime rate

Ashmont

119.4 / 1k

Tolland

119.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ashmont

75

Tolland

58

Population

Ashmont

3,747

Tolland

3,459

Metric leadAshmont 6Tolland 52 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAshmontTolland
Overall score36.4/10037.1/100
Housing (desirability)64.7/10057.8/100
Crime rate119.4 / 1k119.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools59
Weather (desirability)11.8/10011.8/100
Parks & reserves63
Public transport stops4547
Walkability30.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities7558
Planning activity1625
Green cover10.9%10.1%
Population3,7473,459
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Ashmont is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Tolland is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Ashmont tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Tolland stands out for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access.

On balance, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Ashmont, while Tolland remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons