Ashmont vs Mount Austin, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Ashmont | Mount Austin |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.5/100 | 39.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 81.2/100 | 78.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 122.2 / 1k | 122.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 45 | 39 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 45.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 68 | 41 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 4 |
| Population | 3,747 | 4,035 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Ashmont is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Mount Austin is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Austin sits among greener hillside streets, while Ashmont keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Ashmont is stronger for housing affordability and parks and reserves; Mount Austin answers with walkability and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Ashmont, while Mount Austin remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.