Ashmont vs Mount Austin, NSW Suburb Comparison

Mount Austin for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AshmontMount Austin

Overall score

Ashmont

36.4/100

Mount Austin

43.3/100

Crime rate

Ashmont

119.4 / 1k

Mount Austin

119.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ashmont

75

Mount Austin

48

Population

Ashmont

3,747

Mount Austin

4,035

Metric leadAshmont 4Mount Austin 72 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAshmontMount Austin
Overall score36.4/10043.3/100
Housing (desirability)64.7/10063.2/100
Crime rate119.4 / 1k119.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools515
Weather (desirability)11.8/10011.8/100
Parks & reserves63
Public transport stops4539
Walkability30.0/10045.0/100
Nearby amenities7548
Planning activity167
Green cover10.9%23.7%
Population3,7474,035
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Ashmont is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Mount Austin is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Austin sits among greener hillside streets, while Ashmont keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Ashmont is stronger for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Mount Austin answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and walkability.

On balance, households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Austin, while Ashmont remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons