Bourkelands vs Mount Austin, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Bourkelands | Mount Austin |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.7/100 | 39.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 88.3/100 | 78.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 122.1 / 1k | 122.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 24 | 39 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 45.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 46 | 41 |
| Planning activity | 39 | 4 |
| Population | 3,113 | 4,035 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 1/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBourkelands
- Best for familiesBourkelands
- Best for investmentMount Austin
- Best for best valueBourkelands
- Best for best schoolsMount Austin
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Bourkelands is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Mount Austin is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Austin sits among greener hillside streets, while Bourkelands keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Bourkelands tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Mount Austin stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access. On housing, Bourkelands sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Mount Austin.
Bourkelands suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Mount Austin is the stronger match for investors and households prioritising schools.