Bourkelands vs Mount Austin, NSW suburb comparison

Bourkelands for retirees; Mount Austin for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BourkelandsMount Austin

Overall score

Bourkelands

40.8/100

Mount Austin

46.2/100

Crime rate

Bourkelands

119.4 / 1k

Mount Austin

119.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bourkelands

46

Mount Austin

41

Population

Bourkelands

3,113

Mount Austin

4,035

Metric leadBourkelands 4Mount Austin 7across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBourkelandsMount Austin
Overall score40.8/10046.2/100
Housing (desirability)88.3/10078.4/100
Crime rate119.4 / 1k119.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools415
Parks & reserves13
Public transport stops2439
Walkability30.0/10045.0/100
Nearby amenities4641
Planning activity25
Population3,1134,035
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bourkelands is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Mount Austin is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Austin sits among greener hillside streets, while Bourkelands keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Bourkelands tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Mount Austin stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access. On housing, Bourkelands sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Mount Austin.

Bourkelands suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Mount Austin is the stronger match for investors and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons