Overall score
Bourkelands
40.8/100
Glenfield Park
57.4/100
Bourkelands for retirees; Glenfield Park for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bourkelands
40.8/100
Glenfield Park
57.4/100
Crime rate
Bourkelands
119.4 / 1k
Glenfield Park
119.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bourkelands
46
Glenfield Park
103
Population
Bourkelands
3,113
Glenfield Park
5,078
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bourkelands | Glenfield Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.8/100 | 57.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 88.3/100 | 88.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 119.4 / 1k | 119.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 24 | 50 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 80.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 46 | 103 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 6 |
| Population | 3,113 | 5,078 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 3/10 |
Bourkelands reads as a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Glenfield Park is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
Bourkelands tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Glenfield Park stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access. On housing, Bourkelands sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Glenfield Park.
Bourkelands suits retirees more clearly, whereas Glenfield Park is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.