Bourkelands vs Glenfield Park, NSW suburb comparison

Bourkelands for retirees; Glenfield Park for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BourkelandsGlenfield Park

Overall score

Bourkelands

40.8/100

Glenfield Park

57.4/100

Crime rate

Bourkelands

119.4 / 1k

Glenfield Park

119.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bourkelands

46

Glenfield Park

103

Population

Bourkelands

3,113

Glenfield Park

5,078

Metric leadBourkelands 3Glenfield Park 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBourkelandsGlenfield Park
Overall score40.8/10057.4/100
Housing (desirability)88.3/10088.3/100
Crime rate119.4 / 1k119.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools49
Parks & reserves12
Public transport stops2450
Walkability30.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities46103
Planning activity26
Population3,1135,078
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/103/10

Comparison summary

Bourkelands reads as a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Glenfield Park is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

Bourkelands tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Glenfield Park stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access. On housing, Bourkelands sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Glenfield Park.

Bourkelands suits retirees more clearly, whereas Glenfield Park is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons