Bothwell vs Gretna, TAS Suburb Comparison

Bothwell for investment and schools; Gretna for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BothwellGretna

Overall score

Bothwell

35.9/100

Gretna

35.6/100

Crime rate

Bothwell

71.1 / 1k

Gretna

71.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bothwell

17

Gretna

4

Population

Bothwell

499

Gretna

254

Metric leadBothwell 6Gretna 03 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBothwellGretna
Overall score35.9/10035.6/100
Housing (desirability)60.4/10050.6/100
Crime rate71.1 / 1k71.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves4—
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities174
Green cover11.2%7.0%
Population499254
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/101/10

Comparison summary

Bothwell is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, while Gretna is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Bothwell tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities, a larger local community, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Gretna stands out for housing affordability and overall desirability.

Bothwell suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Gretna is the stronger match for families, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons