Gretna vs Ouse, TAS suburb comparison

Gretna for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GretnaOuse

Overall score

Gretna

50.5/100

Ouse

30.9/100

Crime rate

Gretna

12379.3 / 1k

Ouse

9673.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gretna

0

Ouse

0

Population

Gretna

254

Ouse

326

Metric leadGretna 2Ouse 32 tiedacross 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGretnaOuse
Overall score50.5/10030.9/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10014.3/100
Crime rate12379.3 / 1k9673.7 / 1k
Parks & reserves2
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities00
Population254326
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Gretna is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Ouse is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Gretna tends to lead on housing affordability and overall desirability, while Ouse stands out for a quieter safety profile and a larger local community.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Gretna, while Ouse remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons