Overall score
Bourkelands
40.8/100
Springvale
38.2/100
Bourkelands for families and schools; Springvale for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bourkelands
40.8/100
Springvale
38.2/100
Crime rate
Bourkelands
119.4 / 1k
Springvale
119.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bourkelands
46
Springvale
11
Population
Bourkelands
3,113
Springvale
1,851
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bourkelands | Springvale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.8/100 | 38.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 88.3/100 | 88.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 119.4 / 1k | 119.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 24 | 20 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 46 | 11 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 19 |
| Population | 3,113 | 1,851 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Bourkelands is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Springvale is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.
On the data, Bourkelands is stronger for public transport access and nearby cafés and amenities; Springvale answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
On balance, investors are more likely to prefer Springvale, while Bourkelands remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.