Overall score
Bridgenorth
33.4/100
Rosevears
31.3/100
Bridgenorth vs Rosevears, TAS suburb comparison
Bridgenorth for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BridgenorthRosevears
Crime rate
Bridgenorth
2852.8 / 1k
Rosevears
3171.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bridgenorth
2
Rosevears
8
Population
Bridgenorth
403
Rosevears
365
Metric leadBridgenorth 4Rosevears 3across 7 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesBridgenorth
- Best for investmentBridgenorth
- Best for best valueBridgenorth
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bridgenorth | Rosevears |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.4/100 | 31.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 71.4/100 | 67.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 2852.8 / 1k | 3171.4 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | — | 3 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 4.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 8 |
| Population | 403 | 365 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Bridgenorth reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Rosevears is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Bridgenorth sits among greener hillside streets, while Rosevears keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Bridgenorth tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Rosevears stands out for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Bridgenorth, while Rosevears remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.