Overall score
Lanena
22.4/100
Rosevears
31.3/100
Lanena vs Rosevears, TAS suburb comparison
Lanena for families and schools; Rosevears for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LanenaRosevears
Crime rate
Lanena
3401.1 / 1k
Rosevears
3171.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lanena
0
Rosevears
8
Population
Lanena
343
Rosevears
365
Metric leadLanena 0Rosevears 71 tiedacross 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
Comparison summary
Lanena reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Rosevears is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Lanena sits further into the wider countryside, whereas Rosevears is more regionally self-contained.
Lanena tends to lead on a country-town feel and a mature, settled community, while Rosevears stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Lanena sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Rosevears.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Rosevears, while Lanena remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.