Lanena vs Rosevears, TAS Suburb Comparison

Lanena for schools; Rosevears for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LanenaRosevears

Overall score

Lanena

46.3/100

Rosevears

56.3/100

Crime rate

Lanena

18.3 / 1k

Rosevears

18.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lanena

1

Rosevears

9

Population

Lanena

343

Rosevears

365

Metric leadLanena 1Rosevears 63 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLanenaRosevears
Overall score46.3/10056.3/100
Housing (desirability)64.8/10076.6/100
Crime rate18.3 / 1k18.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops23
Walkability3.0/1004.5/100
Nearby amenities19
Green cover78.1%38.9%
Population343365
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/107/10

Comparison summary

Lanena reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Rosevears is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Lanena sits further into the wider countryside, whereas Rosevears is more regionally self-contained.

Lanena tends to lead on a country-town feel and a mature, settled community, while Rosevears stands out for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability. On housing, Lanena sits in a affordable band, compared with a gently premium feel in Rosevears.

Lanena suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Rosevears is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons