Overall score
Brisbane City
55.6/100
New Farm
64.1/100
Brisbane City for retirees; New Farm for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Brisbane City
55.6/100
New Farm
64.1/100
Crime rate
Brisbane City
539.2 / 1k
New Farm
89.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Brisbane City
1,590
New Farm
540
Population
Brisbane City
12,587
New Farm
12,197
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Brisbane City | New Farm |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.6/100 | 64.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.0/100 | 51.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 539.2 / 1k | 89.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 20 | 12 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 18 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 148 | 55 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1,590 | 540 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Green cover | 19.9% | 10.0% |
| Population | 12,587 | 12,197 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Brisbane City reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; New Farm is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Brisbane City tends to lead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while New Farm stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability.
Brisbane City suits investors more clearly, whereas New Farm is the stronger match for retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.