Overall score
Brisbane City
61.6/100
New Farm
64.0/100
Brisbane City for investment; New Farm for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Brisbane City
61.6/100
New Farm
64.0/100
Crime rate
Brisbane City
330.1 / 1k
New Farm
54.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Brisbane City
1,555
New Farm
533
Population
Brisbane City
12,587
New Farm
12,197
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Brisbane City | New Farm |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.6/100 | 64.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 1.4/100 | 9.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 330.1 / 1k | 54.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 20 | 12 |
| Parks & reserves | 18 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 148 | 55 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1,555 | 533 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Population | 12,587 | 12,197 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Brisbane City reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; New Farm is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Brisbane City tends to lead on parks and reserves and public transport access, while New Farm stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Brisbane City suits investors more clearly, whereas New Farm is the stronger match for retirees and families.