Brisbane City vs New Farm, QLD Suburb Comparison

Brisbane City for retirees; New Farm for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Brisbane CityNew Farm

Overall score

Brisbane City

55.6/100

New Farm

64.1/100

Crime rate

Brisbane City

539.2 / 1k

New Farm

89.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Brisbane City

1,590

New Farm

540

Population

Brisbane City

12,587

New Farm

12,197

Metric leadBrisbane City 6New Farm 33 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBrisbane CityNew Farm
Overall score55.6/10064.1/100
Housing (desirability)47.0/10051.1/100
Crime rate539.2 / 1k89.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools2012
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves183
Public transport stops14855
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities1,590540
Planning activity1—
Green cover19.9%10.0%
Population12,58712,197
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Brisbane City reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; New Farm is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Brisbane City tends to lead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while New Farm stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability.

Brisbane City suits investors more clearly, whereas New Farm is the stronger match for retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons