Overall score
Bulimba
71.0/100
New Farm
64.1/100
Bulimba for retirees and families; New Farm for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bulimba
71.0/100
New Farm
64.1/100
Crime rate
Bulimba
40.9 / 1k
New Farm
89.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bulimba
244
New Farm
540
Population
Bulimba
7,623
New Farm
12,197
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bulimba | New Farm |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 71.0/100 | 64.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.7/100 | 51.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 40.9 / 1k | 89.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 12 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 38 | 55 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 244 | 540 |
| Green cover | 5.7% | 10.0% |
| Population | 7,623 | 12,197 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Bulimba reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; New Farm is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Bulimba is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; New Farm answers with schools and education options, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Bulimba the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer New Farm.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.