Bulimba vs Hawthorne, QLD Suburb Comparison

Bulimba for retirees and investment; Hawthorne for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BulimbaHawthorne

Overall score

Bulimba

71.0/100

Hawthorne

58.6/100

Crime rate

Bulimba

40.9 / 1k

Hawthorne

40.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bulimba

244

Hawthorne

83

Population

Bulimba

7,623

Hawthorne

5,090

Metric leadBulimba 7Hawthorne 32 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBulimbaHawthorne
Overall score71.0/10058.6/100
Housing (desirability)52.7/10047.5/100
Crime rate40.9 / 1k40.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools68
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves62
Public transport stops3828
Walkability100.0/10046.0/100
Nearby amenities24483
Green cover5.7%5.8%
Population7,6235,090
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Bulimba is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Hawthorne is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Bulimba pulls ahead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Hawthorne is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.

Bulimba suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Hawthorne is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons