Broome vs Port Hedland, WA Suburb Comparison

Broome for retirees and families; Port Hedland for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BroomePort Hedland

Overall score

Broome

44.3/100

Port Hedland

36.4/100

Crime rate

Broome

277.9 / 1k

Port Hedland

108.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Broome

196

Port Hedland

29

Population

Broome

3,797

Port Hedland

4,081

Metric leadBroome 6Port Hedland 5across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBroomePort Hedland
Overall score44.3/10036.4/100
Housing (desirability)28.2/10040.0/100
Crime rate277.9 / 1k108.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools54
Weather (desirability)2.4/1000.7/100
Parks & reserves—11
Public transport stops1669
Walkability94.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities19629
Green cover2.3%0.5%
Population3,7974,081
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/1010/10

Comparison summary

Broome reads as a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace; Port Hedland is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Broome pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability, whereas Port Hedland is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and a larger local community.

Broome suits families, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Port Hedland is the stronger match for retirees.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons