Overall score
Broome
44.3/100
Port Hedland
36.4/100
Broome for retirees and families; Port Hedland for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Broome
44.3/100
Port Hedland
36.4/100
Crime rate
Broome
277.9 / 1k
Port Hedland
108.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Broome
196
Port Hedland
29
Population
Broome
3,797
Port Hedland
4,081
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Broome | Port Hedland |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.3/100 | 36.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 28.2/100 | 40.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 277.9 / 1k | 108.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 2.4/100 | 0.7/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 69 |
| Walkability | 94.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 196 | 29 |
| Green cover | 2.3% | 0.5% |
| Population | 3,797 | 4,081 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 10/10 |
Broome reads as a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace; Port Hedland is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Broome pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability, whereas Port Hedland is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and a larger local community.
Broome suits families, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Port Hedland is the stronger match for retirees.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.