Overall score
Broome
42.5/100
Port Hedland
35.9/100
Broome vs Port Hedland, WA suburb comparison
Broome for families and investment; Port Hedland for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BroomePort Hedland
Crime rate
Broome
1982.9 / 1k
Port Hedland
1390.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Broome
92
Port Hedland
7
Population
Broome
3,797
Port Hedland
4,081
Metric leadBroome 5Port Hedland 4across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesPort Hedland
- Best for familiesBroome
- Best for investmentBroome
- Best for best valueBroome
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Broome | Port Hedland |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.5/100 | 35.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 18.5/100 | 9.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 1982.9 / 1k | 1390.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 69 |
| Walkability | 79.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 92 | 7 |
| Population | 3,797 | 4,081 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Broome reads as a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace; Port Hedland is a slower-paced mid-sized suburb with open surrounds.
Broome pulls ahead on housing affordability and schools and education options, whereas Port Hedland is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access. On housing, Broome sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Port Hedland.
Broome suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Port Hedland is the stronger match for retirees.