Newman vs Port Hedland, WA Suburb Comparison

Newman for investment; Port Hedland for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

NewmanPort Hedland

Overall score

Newman

28.4/100

Port Hedland

36.4/100

Crime rate

Newman

105.5 / 1k

Port Hedland

105.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Newman

8

Port Hedland

29

Population

Newman

6,456

Port Hedland

4,081

Metric leadNewman 2Port Hedland 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNewmanPort Hedland
Overall score28.4/10036.4/100
Housing (desirability)12.0/10040.0/100
Crime rate105.5 / 1k105.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools54
Weather (desirability)0.1/1000.7/100
Parks & reserves211
Public transport stops—69
Walkability0.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities829
Green cover0.0%0.5%
Population6,4564,081
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/1010/10

Comparison summary

Newman is a slower-paced mid-sized suburb with open surrounds, while Port Hedland is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Newman tends to lead on schools and education options, plus a larger local community, while Port Hedland stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability.

Newman suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Port Hedland is the stronger match for retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons