Overall score
Newman
26.7/100
Port Hedland
35.9/100
Newman vs Port Hedland, WA suburb comparison
Newman for schools; Port Hedland for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
NewmanPort Hedland
Crime rate
Newman
657.5 / 1k
Port Hedland
1390.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Newman
0
Port Hedland
7
Population
Newman
6,456
Port Hedland
4,081
Metric leadNewman 3Port Hedland 6across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesPort Hedland
- Best for familiesPort Hedland
- Best for investmentPort Hedland
- Best for best valuePort Hedland
- Best for best schoolsNewman
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Newman | Port Hedland |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 26.7/100 | 35.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 2.6/100 | 9.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 657.5 / 1k | 1390.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 11 |
| Public transport stops | — | 69 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 7 |
| Population | 6,456 | 4,081 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Newman is a slower-paced mid-sized suburb with open surrounds, while Port Hedland is a slower-paced mid-sized suburb with open surrounds.
Newman tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while Port Hedland stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Newman suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Port Hedland is the stronger match for retirees and families.