Bruce vs Cook, ACT suburb comparison

Cook for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BruceCook

Overall score

Bruce

70.0/100

Cook

67.8/100

Crime rate

Bruce

18.8 / 1k

Cook

11.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bruce

420

Cook

143

Population

Bruce

7,520

Cook

2,965

Metric leadBruce 6Cook 22 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

  • Best for retireesCook
  • Best for familiesCook
  • Best for investmentCook
  • Best for best valueCook

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBruceCook
Overall score70.0/10067.8/100
Housing (desirability)35.7/10076.0/100
Crime rate18.8 / 1k11.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools65
Parks & reserves21
Walkability94.0/10057.5/100
Nearby amenities420143
Planning activity44
Population7,5202,965
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bruce is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Cook is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Bruce is stronger for schools and education options and parks and reserves; Cook answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Cook, while Bruce remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons