Cook vs Hawker, ACT suburb comparison

Cook for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CookHawker

Overall score

Cook

67.8/100

Hawker

65.0/100

Crime rate

Cook

11.3 / 1k

Hawker

44.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cook

143

Hawker

304

Population

Cook

2,965

Hawker

3,008

Metric leadCook 3Hawker 42 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

  • Best for retireesCook
  • Best for familiesCook
  • Best for investmentCook

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCookHawker
Overall score67.8/10065.0/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate11.3 / 1k44.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools56
Parks & reserves1
Walkability57.5/10084.0/100
Nearby amenities143304
Planning activity423
Population2,9653,008
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Cook is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Hawker is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Cook tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and overall desirability, while Hawker stands out for schools and education options and walkability.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Cook, while Hawker remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons