Overall score
Bunkers Hill
40.9/100
Cardigan
43.2/100
Bunkers Hill vs Cardigan, VIC Suburb Comparison
Bunkers Hill for retirees and value; Cardigan for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Bunkers HillCardigan
Crime rate
Bunkers Hill
94.7 / 1k
Cardigan
99.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bunkers Hill
7
Cardigan
3
Population
Bunkers Hill
270
Cardigan
1,064
Metric leadBunkers Hill 5Cardigan 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesBunkers Hill
- Best for familiesCardigan
- Best for best valueBunkers Hill
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bunkers Hill | Cardigan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.9/100 | 43.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.2/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 94.7 / 1k | 99.6 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 7 | 3 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 21 |
| Green cover | 8.9% | 1.6% |
| Population | 270 | 1,064 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Bunkers Hill reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Cardigan is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
On the data, Bunkers Hill is stronger for housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Cardigan answers with a quieter safety profile, walkability, and a larger local community. Bunkers Hill generally means more mid-market housing value, while Cardigan leans toward more sought-after housing.
Choose Bunkers Hill if you are weighing value-focused buyers; lean toward Cardigan for retirees, families, and investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.