Alfredton vs Bunkers Hill, VIC Suburb Comparison

Alfredton for retirees and families; Bunkers Hill for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AlfredtonBunkers Hill

Overall score

Alfredton

47.5/100

Bunkers Hill

40.9/100

Crime rate

Alfredton

55.3 / 1k

Bunkers Hill

94.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Alfredton

189

Bunkers Hill

7

Population

Alfredton

11,822

Bunkers Hill

270

Metric leadAlfredton 7Bunkers Hill 21 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAlfredtonBunkers Hill
Overall score47.5/10040.9/100
Housing (desirability)59.4/10055.2/100
Crime rate55.3 / 1k94.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools4—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves21—
Public transport stops35—
Walkability78.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities1897
Planning activity423
Green cover6.3%8.9%
Population11,822270
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/106/10

Comparison summary

Alfredton is a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Bunkers Hill is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace.

Alfredton tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Bunkers Hill stands out for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook. Alfredton generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Bunkers Hill leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Alfredton, while Bunkers Hill remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons