Burnside vs Nambour, QLD suburb comparison

Burnside for retirees and investment; Nambour for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BurnsideNambour

Overall score

Burnside

46.8/100

Nambour

72.6/100

Crime rate

Burnside

30.3 / 1k

Nambour

30.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Burnside

39

Nambour

486

Population

Burnside

3,104

Nambour

12,145

Metric leadBurnside 2Nambour 8across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBurnsideNambour
Overall score46.8/10072.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10051.4/100
Crime rate30.3 / 1k30.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools45
Parks & reserves926
Public transport stops1141
Walkability16.5/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities39486
Population3,10412,145
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Burnside reads as a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city; Nambour is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Burnside sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Nambour is in a middle-ring position.

Burnside tends to lead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Nambour stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access. Burnside generally means more sought-after housing, while Nambour leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Burnside if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Nambour for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons