Coes Creek vs Nambour, QLD suburb comparison

Coes Creek for retirees and investment; Nambour for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Coes CreekNambour

Overall score

Coes Creek

36.8/100

Nambour

72.6/100

Crime rate

Coes Creek

30.2 / 1k

Nambour

30.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Coes Creek

3

Nambour

486

Population

Coes Creek

1,515

Nambour

12,145

Metric leadCoes Creek 2Nambour 61 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoes CreekNambour
Overall score36.8/10072.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10051.4/100
Crime rate30.2 / 1k30.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools35
Parks & reserves126
Public transport stops41
Walkability0.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities3486
Population1,51512,145
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Coes Creek is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, and Nambour is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Coes Creek sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Nambour is in a middle-ring position.

Coes Creek pulls ahead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Nambour is the better pick for parks and reserves and walkability. On housing, Coes Creek sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Nambour.

Retirees and investors may find Coes Creek the better fit, while families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Nambour.

Related comparisons