Coes Creek vs Nambour, QLD Suburb Comparison

Coes Creek for schools; Nambour for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Coes CreekNambour

Overall score

Coes Creek

35.1/100

Nambour

55.5/100

Crime rate

Coes Creek

50.7 / 1k

Nambour

50.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Coes Creek

3

Nambour

488

Population

Coes Creek

1,515

Nambour

12,145

Metric leadCoes Creek 1Nambour 91 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoes CreekNambour
Overall score35.1/10055.5/100
Housing (desirability)60.0/10062.2/100
Crime rate50.7 / 1k50.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools35
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves126
Public transport stops—41
Walkability0.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities3488
Green cover0.1%10.9%
Population1,51512,145
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Coes Creek is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, and Nambour is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Coes Creek sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Nambour is in a middle-ring position.

Coes Creek pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Nambour is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability. On housing, Coes Creek sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Nambour.

Retirees and investors may find Coes Creek the better fit, while families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Nambour.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons