Overall score
Coes Creek
35.1/100
Nambour
55.5/100
Coes Creek for schools; Nambour for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coes Creek
35.1/100
Nambour
55.5/100
Crime rate
Coes Creek
50.7 / 1k
Nambour
50.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coes Creek
3
Nambour
488
Population
Coes Creek
1,515
Nambour
12,145
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coes Creek | Nambour |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.1/100 | 55.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.0/100 | 62.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 50.7 / 1k | 50.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 26 |
| Public transport stops | — | 41 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 488 |
| Green cover | 0.1% | 10.9% |
| Population | 1,515 | 12,145 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Coes Creek is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, and Nambour is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Coes Creek sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Nambour is in a middle-ring position.
Coes Creek pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Nambour is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability. On housing, Coes Creek sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Nambour.
Retirees and investors may find Coes Creek the better fit, while families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Nambour.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.